Cybersecurity, compliance & authorization for the defense ecosystem

ASSESS • IMPLEMENT • SUSTAIN

Build a defensible security program.
Keep the mission moving.

Across independent C3PAO assessments, RPO implementation support, RMF authorization, specialized assets, and secure cloud enclaves, SOS helps teams turn requirements into operating capability.

Defense supply chain focusImplementation + assessor perspectiveContinuous evidence
SECURITY PROGRAM / 001SOS // FIELD NOTES
MISSION
READY
01 / ASSESS
Scope & evidence
02 / IMPLEMENT
Controls & architecture
03 / SUSTAIN
Monitor & improve
IDENTIFYPROTECTDETECTRESPONDRECOVER

10+ yearsof hands-on cybersecurity and compliance experience

C3PAO + RPOassessment and implementation roles with impartiality safeguards

Federal cloudAzure Government and Microsoft 365 GCC High architecture

ASSESSOR PERSPECTIVE / PRACTITIONER DELIVERY

Two roles. Clear responsibilities.

SOS brings the assessment perspective of a CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) and the implementation focus of a Registered Practitioner Organization (RPO). Engagements are scoped to preserve assessment impartiality.

C3PAO / ASSESSMENT

Independent CMMC assessments

Structured assessment planning, evidence review, interviews, and testing against the applicable CMMC requirements, with findings documented through the prescribed process.

Discuss an assessment ↗
RPO / IMPLEMENTATION

Readiness and remediation

Practical help defining the CUI boundary, implementing controls, preparing SSPs and POA&Ms, managing evidence, and operating the program over time.

Explore implementation delivery ↗

Assessment and advisory work are evaluated for conflicts of interest before engagement. A readiness or implementation client should not assume SOS can also perform its certification assessment.

ADJACENT NIST EXPERTISE

Security controls and secure software, built into the program.

These disciplines strengthen the control environment beyond a checklist and connect architecture decisions to operational evidence.

NIST SP 800-53 REV. 5

Security & privacy controls

Control selection, tailoring, implementation, assessment preparation, and continuous monitoring for RMF and ATO programs. SOS connects the control baseline to SSP narratives, inherited responsibilities, POA&Ms, and defensible evidence.

Read the NIST control catalog ↗
NIST SP 800-218

Secure software development

Secure Software Development Framework practices for preparing teams, protecting code, producing well-secured software, and responding to vulnerabilities across the software lifecycle.

Read the NIST framework ↗

WHAT WE DO

One partner across the full lifecycle.

Engage SOS for a focused workstream or a coordinated program—from the first CUI boundary discussion through authorization and ongoing operations.

01 / ASSESS

CMMC & NIST 800-171

Scoping, gap analysis, SSP and POA&M development, technical remediation, readiness, and C3PAO assessment support.

Discuss CMMC work
02 / AUTHORIZE

RMF / ATO

NIST SP 800-53 control implementation, assessment, authorization packages, eMASS support, cloud inheritance, and continuous authorization.

Discuss authorization
03 / BUILD

Secure enclaves

Bounded CUI environments in Azure Government and GCC High, with virtual desktops, identity, data controls, monitoring, and operational procedures.

Compare enclave variants
04 / EXTEND

OT & specialized assets

Scope and protect workflows that touch production equipment, labs, CNC systems, and isolated assets, including controlled transfer paths.

Discuss specialized assets
05 / GOVERN

GRC & documentation

Control ownership, policies, SSPs, POA&Ms, risk registers, inherited-control mapping, and organized evidence for CMMC and RMF programs.

Explore GRC delivery
06 / MONITOR

Continuous monitoring

Telemetry and alert review, vulnerability tracking, configuration drift, incident follow-up, and recurring control evidence tied to assigned owners.

Explore monitoring
07 / EXECUTE

Task management

Translate findings and obligations into owned tasks, milestones, due dates, dependencies, and review gates that keep implementation moving.

Explore delivery tracking
START HERE

Unsure where to begin?

Tell us what you need to protect and the outcome you’re pursuing. We’ll help identify a practical first step.

Take the CMMC quick check

GOVERN • MONITOR • EXECUTE

Run compliance as an operating program.

Documentation, monitoring, and work tracking should reinforce one another. SOS connects requirements to evidence, findings to owners, and decisions to a visible delivery plan.

01 / GRC & DOCUMENTATION

Keep the record assessment ready.

We build and maintain the system narrative behind the controls, with traceable responsibilities and a clear path from requirement to implementation and evidence.

  • System security plans and boundary descriptions
  • Policies, procedures, control narratives, and inheritance
  • Risk registers, POA&Ms, evidence inventories, and review records
Typical outputA current, reviewable body of evidence
02 / CONTINUOUS MONITORING

See changes before they become gaps.

We define the telemetry, review rhythm, escalation path, and control checks needed after implementation and through authorization or assessment cycles.

  • Sentinel and Defender signal coverage and triage
  • Vulnerability, configuration, and exception follow-up
  • Recurring metrics, control reviews, and evidence refresh
Typical outputFindings, decisions, and trends with owners
03 / TASK MANAGEMENT

Turn findings into finished work.

Security work is organized into phases with accountable owners, dependencies, target dates, and formal review points for implementation and sustainment.

  • Remediation backlog and milestone planning
  • Assigned actions, due dates, risks, and status reviews
  • Quality gates linking completed tasks to evidence
Typical outputA visible plan from gap to closure

SECURITY ARCHITECTURE / INTERACTIVE

Seven controls. One coherent boundary.

Explore how identity, network, data, endpoints, detection, and cloud applications work together in a GCC High enclave. Select a numbered control to inspect its architecture.

01 / IDENTITY & ACCESS

Device trust before access

Intune manages device configuration and reports compliance signals to Microsoft Entra ID. Conditional Access uses those signals with identity, location, and sign-in risk to decide whether users may reach approved cloud resources. Policies are designed around each user and CUI workflow.

Intune device compliance, Entra Conditional Access, and protected Microsoft 365 accessSelect diagram to view full size ↗

REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE

GCC High secure data flow

This example traces CUI between a protected virtual workspace, approved storage and Microsoft 365 GCC High services. Identity, policy, data protection, and monitoring provide separate control paths. We map the actual tenant, services, and inherited responsibilities before using a design as an implementation baseline.

Discuss your data flow ↗
Example GCC High CUI flow across virtual desktop, storage, Microsoft 365, identity, and monitoring services

TURNKEY ENCLAVE IMPLEMENTATION

Choose the boundary that fits the work.

Each variant combines architecture, control ownership, SSP and procedures, evidence, monitoring, and operational support. The diagrams illustrate starting patterns; final boundaries follow actual CUI flows and equipment.

VARIANT 01 / FULLY VIRTUALIZED

Keep CUI in the cloud workspace

Variant 1 diagram: untrusted laptops connect to a GCC High Azure Virtual Desktop enclave and Microsoft 365 services

Users connect through Windows App with Entra ID, MFA, and Conditional Access. CUI work runs on AVD session hosts and approved GCC High services; local download, clipboard, USB, and print pathways are restricted by policy.

Implementation path
  1. Map CUI applications, users, and cloud services; define the authorization boundary.
  2. Deploy the AVD workspace, identity policies, network egress, collaboration, and protection controls.
  3. Validate redirection restrictions, monitoring, backup, evidence, and operating procedures.
Best fitWorkflows that can remain in a virtual desktop with no required local CUI processing.
Explore Variant 1 ↗
VARIANT 02 / HYBRID ENDPOINT

Extend trust to approved devices

Variant 2 diagram: untrusted and managed laptops connect to the GCC High virtual workspace

Keep the virtual enclave while adding managed endpoints for approved local work. Intune enrollment, Defender protection, device compliance, Conditional Access, encryption, and controlled peripherals become part of the assessed boundary.

Implementation path
  1. Identify which tasks require local CUI processing and which users and devices are authorized.
  2. Harden and enroll endpoints; define access, storage, transfer, printing, and recovery rules.
  3. Test cloud-to-device data flows and collect endpoint and policy evidence.
Best fitTeams that need approved local applications or peripherals alongside cloud collaboration.
Explore Variant 2 ↗
VARIANT 03 / SPECIALIZED ASSETS

Control the equipment handoff

Variant 3 diagram: managed engineering endpoint and controlled media transfer to isolated OT and CNC equipment

Extend the hybrid model to isolated lab, CNC, OT, or other specialized assets through an explicitly designed transfer process. The air gap and media workflow are documented, with roles and safeguards matched to the equipment's capabilities.

Implementation path
  1. Trace files to and from equipment and classify each asset and transfer point.
  2. Design approved media handling, malware checks, custody, physical controls, and exceptions.
  3. Validate the handoff with operators and document evidence and residual risk.
Best fitEngineering or production workflows where isolated equipment must receive or produce controlled information.
Explore Variant 3 ↗
Turnkey deliveryArchitecture and deployment · SSP and procedures · security monitoring · evidence collection · assessment or authorization support · ongoing administration

HOW WE WORK

Make the boundary clear. Make the controls real.

We connect architecture decisions with the documents, evidence, and operating routines that an assessment or authorization depends on.

01

Define

Map data, users, systems, dependencies, requirements, and ownership.

02

Design

Select the boundary, inherited controls, technical safeguards, and procedures.

03

Prove

Implement controls and assemble testable evidence and authorization artifacts.

04

Sustain

Track changes, findings, vulnerabilities, monitoring, and recurring reviews.

FIND YOUR PATH

What are you working toward?

Choose the outcome closest to your current need. This is a starting point for a conversation, not an assessment or compliance determination.

RECOMMENDED START

CMMC scope and readiness review

Start with your contracts, CUI flows, asset categories, and existing controls. Then prioritize gaps and evidence before selecting implementation work.

  • Boundary and CUI flow review
  • Control and evidence baseline
  • Remediation roadmap
Discuss this path

WHO WE SERVE

Built for teams with real delivery constraints.

Defense contractors and subcontractors, research organizations, professional services firms, and federal program teams that must protect sensitive work while keeping operations productive. We tailor scope to the actual system and mission.

LET’S TALK

Bring us your boundary, deadline, or challenge.

Share the requirement, the systems involved, and your target date. We’ll help frame the right next conversation.