Independent CMMC assessments
Structured assessment planning, evidence review, interviews, and testing against the applicable CMMC requirements, with findings documented through the prescribed process.
Discuss an assessment ↗ASSESS • IMPLEMENT • SUSTAIN
Across independent C3PAO assessments, RPO implementation support, RMF authorization, specialized assets, and secure cloud enclaves, SOS helps teams turn requirements into operating capability.
10+ yearsof hands-on cybersecurity and compliance experience
C3PAO + RPOassessment and implementation roles with impartiality safeguards
Federal cloudAzure Government and Microsoft 365 GCC High architecture
VARIANT 1 / THE ENCLAVE, ASSEMBLED
Watch a fully virtualized CUI enclave take shape across Azure Government and Microsoft 365 GCC High. Select a layer to explore the control it adds.
Provision the Azure Government subscription, resource group, virtual network, managed disks, and backup resources. Record the boundary and the provider responsibilities inherited by the customer.
Evidence to maintainResource inventory, configuration baseline, shared-responsibility record.
A reference pattern for CMMC Level 2 readiness. Certification depends on the organization’s complete implementation, scope, operating practices, and assessment. The layers are logical safeguards, not additional physical networks.
ASSESSOR PERSPECTIVE / PRACTITIONER DELIVERY
SOS brings the assessment perspective of a CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) and the implementation focus of a Registered Practitioner Organization (RPO). Engagements are scoped to preserve assessment impartiality.
Structured assessment planning, evidence review, interviews, and testing against the applicable CMMC requirements, with findings documented through the prescribed process.
Discuss an assessment ↗Practical help defining the CUI boundary, implementing controls, preparing SSPs and POA&Ms, managing evidence, and operating the program over time.
Explore implementation delivery ↗Assessment and advisory work are evaluated for conflicts of interest before engagement. A readiness or implementation client should not assume SOS can also perform its certification assessment.
ADJACENT NIST EXPERTISE
These disciplines strengthen the control environment beyond a checklist and connect architecture decisions to operational evidence.
Control selection, tailoring, implementation, assessment preparation, and continuous monitoring for RMF and ATO programs. SOS connects the control baseline to SSP narratives, inherited responsibilities, POA&Ms, and defensible evidence.
Read the NIST control catalog ↗Secure Software Development Framework practices for preparing teams, protecting code, producing well-secured software, and responding to vulnerabilities across the software lifecycle.
Read the NIST framework ↗WHAT WE DO
Engage SOS for a focused workstream or a coordinated program—from the first CUI boundary discussion through authorization and ongoing operations.
Scoping, gap analysis, SSP and POA&M development, technical remediation, readiness, and C3PAO assessment support.
Discuss CMMC workNIST SP 800-53 control implementation, assessment, authorization packages, eMASS support, cloud inheritance, and continuous authorization.
Discuss authorizationBounded CUI environments in Azure Government and GCC High, with virtual desktops, identity, data controls, monitoring, and operational procedures.
Compare enclave variantsScope and protect workflows that touch production equipment, labs, CNC systems, and isolated assets, including controlled transfer paths.
Discuss specialized assetsControl ownership, policies, SSPs, POA&Ms, risk registers, inherited-control mapping, and organized evidence for CMMC and RMF programs.
Explore GRC deliveryTelemetry and alert review, vulnerability tracking, configuration drift, incident follow-up, and recurring control evidence tied to assigned owners.
Explore monitoringTranslate findings and obligations into owned tasks, milestones, due dates, dependencies, and review gates that keep implementation moving.
Explore delivery trackingTell us what you need to protect and the outcome you’re pursuing. We’ll help identify a practical first step.
Take the CMMC quick checkGOVERN • MONITOR • EXECUTE
Documentation, monitoring, and work tracking should reinforce one another. SOS connects requirements to evidence, findings to owners, and decisions to a visible delivery plan.
We build and maintain the system narrative behind the controls, with traceable responsibilities and a clear path from requirement to implementation and evidence.
We define the telemetry, review rhythm, escalation path, and control checks needed after implementation and through authorization or assessment cycles.
Security work is organized into phases with accountable owners, dependencies, target dates, and formal review points for implementation and sustainment.
SECURITY ARCHITECTURE / INTERACTIVE
Explore how identity, network, data, endpoints, detection, and cloud applications work together in a GCC High enclave. Select a numbered control to inspect its architecture.
Intune manages device configuration and reports compliance signals to Microsoft Entra ID. Conditional Access uses those signals with identity, location, and sign-in risk to decide whether users may reach approved cloud resources. Policies are designed around each user and CUI workflow.
Select diagram to view full size ↗REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE
This example traces CUI between a protected virtual workspace, approved storage and Microsoft 365 GCC High services. Identity, policy, data protection, and monitoring provide separate control paths. We map the actual tenant, services, and inherited responsibilities before using a design as an implementation baseline.
Discuss your data flow ↗
TURNKEY ENCLAVE IMPLEMENTATION
Each variant combines architecture, control ownership, SSP and procedures, evidence, monitoring, and operational support. The diagrams illustrate starting patterns; final boundaries follow actual CUI flows and equipment.

Users connect through Windows App with Entra ID, MFA, and Conditional Access. CUI work runs on AVD session hosts and approved GCC High services; local download, clipboard, USB, and print pathways are restricted by policy.

Keep the virtual enclave while adding managed endpoints for approved local work. Intune enrollment, Defender protection, device compliance, Conditional Access, encryption, and controlled peripherals become part of the assessed boundary.

Extend the hybrid model to isolated lab, CNC, OT, or other specialized assets through an explicitly designed transfer process. The air gap and media workflow are documented, with roles and safeguards matched to the equipment's capabilities.
HOW WE WORK
We connect architecture decisions with the documents, evidence, and operating routines that an assessment or authorization depends on.
Map data, users, systems, dependencies, requirements, and ownership.
Select the boundary, inherited controls, technical safeguards, and procedures.
Implement controls and assemble testable evidence and authorization artifacts.
Track changes, findings, vulnerabilities, monitoring, and recurring reviews.
FIND YOUR PATH
Choose the outcome closest to your current need. This is a starting point for a conversation, not an assessment or compliance determination.
Start with your contracts, CUI flows, asset categories, and existing controls. Then prioritize gaps and evidence before selecting implementation work.
WHO WE SERVE
Defense contractors and subcontractors, research organizations, professional services firms, and federal program teams that must protect sensitive work while keeping operations productive. We tailor scope to the actual system and mission.
LET’S TALK
Share the requirement, the systems involved, and your target date. We’ll help frame the right next conversation.